AP Gov - SCOTUS FRQ - McCulloch v Maryland
SCOTUS FRQ This question requires you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied in class with one you have not studied in class. A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study in class is presented below and provides all of the information you need to know about this case to answer the prompt. In 2010 Arizona passed a law that sought to reduce the number of undocumented immigrants in the state. The law made it a crime to seek or obtain work in the state without proper documentation, and it also made hiring, sheltering, or transporting undocumented people illegal. It also gave local law enforcement the authority to require proof of residency in the course of a lawful arrest, and it gave them the authority to perform warrantless stops of people they suspected of being undocumented. The United States Department of Justice challenged the state law as an interference with the national government’s enumerated powers to regulate and enforce immigration law. In Arizona v. United States (2012), the Supreme Court agreed with the United States in a 5–3 decision stating most of the provisions of the law did conflict with federal authority. The Court said, “The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens. . . . This authority rests, in part, on the National Government’s constitutional power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and its inherent power as sovereign to control and conduct relations with foreign nations.” Question 3 Based on the information above, respond to the following questions.
Question 1
Short answer
Identify a common constitutional principle used to make a ruling in both McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) and Arizona v. United States (2012).
Question 2
Short answer
Explain how the facts of McCulloch v. Maryland and the facts of Arizona v. United States led to a similar holding in both cases.
Question 3
Short answer
Explain an action that Congress could take to respond to the Arizona v. United States decision if it disagreed with the decision.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.
Other Civics Assignments
5.2 FRQ: Voter Turnout InfluencesAdam Smith, Wealth of Nationsai essay check nibbaAnalysis of a Supreme Court CaseAnalyze the Influence of a Political Philosopher on the Development of American GovernmentAP Gov - Quantitative Analysis FRQ - Education Funding - HandwrittenAP Gov - Quantitative Analysis FRQ - Unit 1 - School Funding - TypedBalance of PowerCauses of World War ICivics and Community: Understanding Home Renovation RegulationsComparative and Absolute Advantage in ProductionConstitutional AmendmentsEvaluation of American Democracy at PerilFeb. Current Events AssignmentFishbowl Reflection QuestionsFoundations of NationalismFraming the Constitution Conceptual FRQGerrymandering Cartoon AnalysisGov Test #2, 3.1.24Hats of the President ReflectionMid term review open response questionsPeople's PiePeter Carlo PacconePolitical Party IdeologyPowers of the President Inquiry Based QuestionProblem 4-1 - Methods for Resolving DisputesProblem 4.2 - Dispute at the MallReconstruction Amendments in Modern AmericaThe Evolution of Political PartiesThe President's Daily ScheduleUnderstanding Article I of the U.S. ConstitutionUnderstanding Civic Engagement in Democratic SocietiesUnderstanding the Impeachment ProcessVoting and ElectionsWhat is the difference between and expressed and implied power of Congress?Writing Assessment -- Gideon v. Wainwright