Florence Kelley RA

Question 1

Essay
At the turn of the 20th century, there were no federal child labor laws in place. As such, children as young as five worked tirelessly through the night. Florence Kelley led the charge to reform these inhumane working conditions, seeking to end child labor and improve the conditions for working women. On July 22, 1905, Florence Kelley delivered the following speech at the National American Woman Suffrage Association’s convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. After reading the speech,
write an essay in which you analyze how Florence Kelley makes rhetorical choices to develop her argument against child labor.



We have, in this country, two million children under the age of sixteen years who are earning their bread. They vary in age from six and seven years (in the cotton mills of Georgia) and eight, nine, and ten years (in the coal-breakers of Pennsylvania), to fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen years in more enlightened states.
No other portion of the wage-earning class increased so rapidly from decade to decade as the young girls from fourteen to twenty years. Men increase, women increase, youth increase, boys increase in the ranks of the breadwinners; but no contingent so doubles from census period to census period (both by percent and by count of heads), as does the contingent of girls between twelve and twenty years of age. They are in commerce, in offices, in manufacturing.
Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to buy.

In Alabama, the law provides that a child under sixteen years of age shall not work in a cotton mill at night longer than eight hours, and Alabama does better in this respect than any other southern
state. North and South Carolina and Georgia place no restriction upon the work of children at night; and while we sleep little white girls will be working tonight in the mills in those states, working eleven hours at night.

In Georgia, there is no restriction whatever! A girl of six or seven years, just tall enough to reach the bobbins, may work eleven hours by day or by night. And they will do so tonight, while we sleep.

Nor is it only in the South that these things
occur. Alabama does better than New Jersey. For Alabama limits the children's work at night to eight hours, while New Jersey permits it all night
long. Last year New Jersey took a long backward step. A good law was repealed which had required women and [children] to stop work at six in the evening and at noon on Friday. Now, therefore, in New Jersey, boys and girls, after their 14th birthday, enjoy the pitiful privilege of working all night long.

In Pennsylvania, until last May it was lawful for children, 13 years of age, to work twelve hours at night. A little girl, on her thirteenth birthday, could start away from her home at half-past five in the afternoon, carrying her pail of midnight luncheon as happier people carry their midday luncheon, and could work in the mill from six at night until six in the morning, without violating any law of the Commonwealth.

If the mothers and the teachers in Georgia could vote, would the Georgia Legislature have refused at every session for the last three years to stop the work in the mills of children under twelve years of age?

Would the New Jersey Legislature have passed that shameful repealed bill enabling girls of fourteen years to work all night, if the mothers in New Jersey were enfranchised? Until the mothers in the great industrial states are enfranchised, we shall none of us be able to free our consciences from participation in this great evil. No one in this room tonight can feel free from such participation. The children make our shoes in the shoe factories; they knit our stockings, our knitted underwear in the knitting factories. They spin and weave our cotton underwear in the cotton mills. Children braid straw for our hats, they spin and weave the silk and velvet wherewith we trim our hats. They stamp buckles and metal ornaments of all kinds, as well as pins and hat-pins. Under the sweating system, tiny children make artificial flowers and neckwear for us to buy. They carry bundles of garments from the factories to the tenements, little beasts of burden, robbed of school life that they may work for us.
We do not wish this. We prefer to have our work done by men and women. But we are almost powerless. Not wholly powerless, however, are citizens who enjoy the right of petition. For myself, I shall use this power in every possible way until the right to the ballot is granted, and then I shall continue to use both.

What can we do to free our conscience? There is one line of action by which we can do
much. We can enlist the workingmen on behalf of our enfranchisement just in proportion as we strive with them to free the children. No labor organization in this country ever fails to respond to an appeal for help in the freeing of the children.

For the sake of the children, for the Republic in which these children will vote after we are dead, and for the sake of our cause, we should enlist the workingmen voters, with us, in this task of freeing the children from toil!

Teach with AI superpowers

Why teachers love Class Companion

Import assignments to get started in no time.

Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.

Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.

Other English Language Assignments

11/21 "A Black Student was Suspended for his Hairstyle..." Rhetorical Analysis2008 AP® English Language and Composition Free-Response Question on Corporate Sponsorship in Schools2008 AP English Language & Composition Rhetorical Analysis Prompt2009 Q3 Adversity2010 Q3 Humor2011B Q3 Freedom and Safety2013 Monument Synthesis2014 Q3 Creativity2017 Synthesis Essay - The Potential Role of Libraries in Our Future2018 AP Language Argument Prompt2019 Rhetorical Analysis2023 Favorite Memories2. Is Taylor Swift Overrated? An Analysis of Her Impact and CriticismAbigail Adams letter analysisAbigail Adams RA FRQAbsent Students Only: Analyzing Krakauer's Perspective on Chris McCandlessAI TechnologiesAnalysis 2.0 of Paul Bogard's Argument on Preserving Natural DarknessAnalysis of Lahiri's Argument on Food, Traditions, and CultureAnalysis of Li Bai's 'Quiet Night Thought'Analysis of Madeleine Albright's Commencement SpeechAnalyzing Krakauer's Perspective on Chris McCandlessAnalyzing Rhetorical Choices in Rice's Advocacy for Economic FreedomAnalyzing the Rhetoric of Economic ForecastsAnimal Farm Choice #5Animal Farm Essay #2Animal Farm Essay #3Animal Farm Essay #6Animal Farm Essay Choice #1Animal Farm Essay choice #4Animal Farm Literary AnalysisAnnotated Bibliography AssignmentAOW "How Many Transgendered and Intersex People Live in the US?"AP Argument Essay (Overrated Prompt)AP English Lang Research PaperAP English Language FRQ #3 (Argument) - Purpose of EducationAP Full Length Test FRQ 1A pirate or love storyAP Lang: Argument: The Validity of Eleanor Roosevelt's Claim on True PatriotismAP Lang. Q3: Involuntary LiesAP Language Essay: Columbus DayAP Language Mock Exam Argument EssayAP Language Rhetorical Analysis Rubric MAHSAP Success - AP English Language: "Ain't I a Woman?"AP Success - AP English Language: E-Learning in the COVID PandemicAP Success - AP English Language: English and Its UsageAP Success - AP English Language: Fiction and Non-Fiction are Equally ImportantAP Success - AP English Language: Fighting Digital AddictionAP Success - AP English Language: Medico-Legal InvestigationsAP Success - AP English Language: Medieval Spain in the Contemporary Mind