AP Success - AP US History: Andrew Carnegie on the Estate Tax
Industrialist Andrew Carnegie was against a national income tax.
There are but three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. It can be left to the families of the decedents; or it can be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, it can be administered during their lives by its possessors…
The first is the most injudicious…Why should men leave great fortunes to their children? If this is done from affection, is it not misguided affection? Observation teaches that, generally speaking, it is not well for the children that they should be so burdened…
As to the second mode, that of leaving wealth at death for public uses, it may be said that this is only a means for the disposal of wealth, provided a man is content to wait until he is dead before it becomes of much good in the world…
The growing disposition to tax more and more heavily large estates left at death is a cheering indication of the growth of a salutary change in public opinion. Of all forms of taxation, this seems the wisest…
This policy would work powerfully to induce the rich man to attend to the administration of wealth during his life, which is the end that society should always have in view, as being that by far most fruitful for the people.
Andrew Carnegie. "Wealth," North American Review, 148, no. 391 (June 1889).
Question 1
Briefly identify one perspective about wealth described in the excerpt.
Question 2
Briefly explain one historical trend during the Gilded Age that influenced the excerpt's message.
Question 3
Briefly explain one way how Carnegie's view of wealth influenced other wealthy Americans during the Gilded Age.
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.