Andrew Jackson King or Common Man
Was Andrew Jackson a king or champion of the common man?
. . . [The Federal] Government is one of specific powers, and it can rightfully exercise only the powers expressly granted, and those that may be "necessary and proper" to carry them into effect; all others being reserved expressly to the States, or to the people… The advocates of the Tariff have offered no such proof [that it is necessary and proper]. It is true, that the third [sic; eighth] section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States authorizes Congress to lay and collect an impost duty, but it is granted as a tax power, for the sole purpose of revenue; a power in its nature essentially different from that of imposing protective or prohibitory duties. . . . The Constitution grants to Congress the power of imposing a duty on imports for revenue; which power is abused by being converted into an instrument for rearing up the industry of one section of the country on the ruins of another. The violation then consists in using a power, granted for one object, to advance another, and that by the sacrifice of the original object. . . .”
“South Carolina’s Exposition and Protest” (John C. Calhoun on the Tariff of 1828)
Question 1
Why do South Carolinians believe that the tariff of 1828 is unconstitutional?
Question 2
What would a supporter of Andrew Jackson say in response to the leaders of the nullification on South Carolina?
Question 3
How could a historian use this excerpt to help their argument that Andrew Jackson was a king?
Teach with AI superpowers
Why teachers love Class Companion
Import assignments to get started in no time.
Create your own rubric to customize the AI feedback to your liking.
Overrule the AI feedback if a student disputes.